Amy Winehouse Gains Weight On Junk Food Diet | On The Road To Recovery?

For the past few months we’ve all been very worried about Amy Winehouse’ state of mind and also physical health. Not only has she been abusing her body with stack loads of drugs of all variations, she has lost an incredible amount of weight… too much in fact.
We all know the reason for Amy’s recent dramatic weight loss, so it fills me with some pleasure that she seems to be making an effort to gain weight now, after turning to a diet of fast food. Maybe I’m just being hopeful but could this be the first sign that Amy wants to start being a bit healthier?
It’s weird to be equating fast food with healthy eating but when you are as painfully stick thin as Amy, anything which makes you put weight on and fast has got to be good. But will this be of any benefit if she doesn’t also come off drugs at the same time?
Winehouse has apparently eaten McDonalds for the last 7 days and gained an incredible stone in weight already. Also high on her menu has been carb heavy Caribbean food such as yams, dumplings, bananas, jerk chicken and rice and peas.
At the depths of Amy Winehouse‘ ‘problem period’ a few weeks ago she was thought to have slumped to just 6 and a half stone in weight, and resembled a stick insect… a drug addict one at that.
Come on Amy, keep it up, get to a healthier weight and stay there. Also, you know that place they call Rehab, it’s time you swallowed your pride, ignored your own song, and gave it a go. It can’t be all bad!
Tags: Amy Winehouse, British, Caribbean, Diet, Drugs, Food, Jerk-Chicken, Junk-Food, McDonalds, UK, Weight, YamsRelated Stories
POSTED IN: Amy Winehouse, News, Op Ed
32 opinions for Amy Winehouse Gains Weight On Junk Food Diet | On The Road To Recovery?
Gerard McGarry
Sep 15, 2007 at 9:36 am
Dave - I definitely prefer the ‘fatter’ Amy. she’s such a beautiful girl, the skeletal look does nothing for her!
Musical Tidbits
Sep 16, 2007 at 10:32 pm
[…] shared the news of Amy Winehouse and what she’s doing to get […]
meme
Sep 20, 2007 at 12:59 pm
im questioning why she would cover up her tatts?? i don’t think i’e ever seen a pic of her awards ceromony or otherwise w/o them. either that’s not her or the pictured has been altered or something….. she had two upper arm tatts and now they are gone???
Mel
Oct 20, 2007 at 4:12 pm
your a fucking idiot. that picture of when shes thicker is of a few years ago. not now. she didnt have her tats at the time.
Dave Parrack
Oct 21, 2007 at 1:09 am
Thanks for such kind words.
It’s you’re not your.
That photo is indeed from a few years, I used it just to demonstrate what a state she is now in.
Aleisha
Dec 23, 2007 at 10:34 pm
She definately looked a lot more attractive when she was at a healthy weight.
Chinadoll58
Dec 29, 2007 at 6:19 pm
“and life is like a pipe & I’m a penny rolling up the walls inside” - “Back to black”
Crack cocaine is smoked in a pipe. She loves puff and she’s letting the pipe smoke her. Oh boy.
It’s going to be hard for Amy but SHE has to want to be healthy and drug free. It’s her call no matter what is said to her or about her. I’m hoping for her strength to kick in. Amy is very passionate about love. I hope she learns to love herself and be passionate about her life.
matt
Jan 4, 2008 at 10:29 pm
who ever wrote this is a fucking moron, that’s not wven the same pweson in those pictures
Dave Parrack
Jan 7, 2008 at 3:18 pm
Matt, I take it you can’t read then because it quite clearly states who wrote this article, namely me.
Also, you need your eyes testing anyway because that is Amy Winehouse in both pictures. One is from a few years ago before the drugs started having an effect on her looks.
salsa
Feb 15, 2008 at 10:12 am
Dave - thank you for this article and the noted differences and comparison. I find it interesting how the people who post here find it necessary to use foul and angry language. So offensive and so very unnecessary. I mean, come on people! You look so foolish when you post erroneous comments to the author or nasty comments to other posters who are just trying to understand.
Dominik
Feb 17, 2008 at 8:00 pm
dave, -.- i think the pic of that healthy looking amy is the older one and if you think another way of it , you should get your brain tested.
look at her arms man and you will see!!
i just say tattoo
salsa
Feb 21, 2008 at 8:49 am
Hey Dominik - I think Dave knows the “bigger” Amy is from years ago. If it is not clear from the article, confirmation of this is in the posts. Why does no one here get it?
Dominik
Feb 21, 2008 at 12:15 pm
okay, but why does he take an old pic to show that amy looks healthier today???
i thinks thats nonesense
allen
Feb 21, 2008 at 3:35 pm
i think she looks better thinner. she may have taken it a bit too far, but less seems is more seems to be working for her.
Rachael
Feb 22, 2008 at 2:43 am
The person above of me saying that she looks “better” thinner is simply perpetuating the problem. Girls are starving themselves around the globe to achieve Amy’s look: drug addicted. Her skinniness is not natural, and anyone saying that she looks better that way is harming women deeply.
Dominik
Feb 22, 2008 at 6:26 pm
Raechael is absolutely right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
allen did you read or watched any news???
how many girls around the world die because of people like you??????????????
you should ashame yourself about your post allen!!!!!!!!!
Dominik
Feb 22, 2008 at 6:27 pm
thats my opinion
Random Guy
Feb 24, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Amy looks fantastic in the photo on the right- she is one of the most mesmerizing, talented, and beautiful vocalists I have ever seen. I hope she gets well soon.
..but- I think that Allen is entitled to his opinion. It is not some random guy’s fault that Amy or any other female is overly thin. Attitude’s about female beauty are institutionalized– and reinforced by men AND women that make money within the fashion and entertainment industries.
Dominik
Feb 26, 2008 at 2:26 am
i´ve seen a video of amys part at brit music awards
she really looks better now that she became thicker.to be honest as i seen her i acctually became hard^.^
Scott
Feb 29, 2008 at 2:24 am
uh, this before and after is the opposite. The pic on the left is her heroin addicted extacy & weed addicted crack smoking skinny ass, and the pic on the right is what she looked like a few years (and a few tats) ago. If you want to see her TODAY, go to http://www.thesuperficial.com, and you’ll see daily updates. I don’t work for them, but I’ve followed the Winehouse saga on that site with daily paparazi snaps. Like last night when in a drug addicted haze she wandered off to the market in the middle of the night with a glazed look in her eyes and one shoe missing from the picture.
This “Amy getting fat” is a fiction. The person who keeps angrily defending this article is a fraud - one response said, “I know it’s not current. This is a representation of what she looks like” (or something to that effect) - is that like the “actual dramatizations” in the truck commercials? You mean it’s *real bullshit*?
Please. How can you have something like this live on the web. Are you that desperate for attention? Show me PROOF of Amy fattening up or shut the hell up with this misinformation/photoshop opportunity. I’ve seen that SAME picture, switched around with the opposite headline on countless sites including the Superficial. Nice.
Dominik
Mar 1, 2008 at 1:35 am
i dont know if you are able to think on your own but its like you said paparazzi pictures and paparazzi do everything to keep a rumor or any gossip about stars running because they want to make money out of embarrising fotos and thats the only way for them to get so much money for these photos.
did you seen amy at brit music awards????
she looks healthier for real!!!!!!
she isnt that thin anymore!!!!
Madame Butterfly
Mar 4, 2008 at 3:28 pm
What is the significance of “Back to Black”
d
Mar 4, 2008 at 7:28 pm
her tattoo is on the wrong arm in the thicker picture…
Kat
Apr 23, 2008 at 5:13 pm
I have the urge to state again that the second picture (on the right) is an older picture of her.
Notice how she doesn’t have tattoos?..
Also, Dave, if you knew that, you should have stated that because you’re using false imagery to aid in your point.
In regards to your article, she has not gained weight.. Especially not as much as you’ve claimed.. So I don’t know what you’re talking about, and how you come up with these assumptions.
Dan
Apr 24, 2008 at 11:59 am
Kat,
Seriously- what’s the problem? This article does NOTHING to imply that the photo on the right is more recent than the one on the left.
The article describes a possible recent gain in weight:
“Winehouse has apparently eaten McDonalds for the last 7 days”
Exactly from what statement in this article are you taking that the Author is using photographs to show a gain in weight from SEVEN DAYS. Are you kidding? Who would imagine that someone could gain what appears to be something like 25% of her body mass back in 7 days????
Additionally- the author describes Winehouse’s painfully thin appearance as worrisome:
“At the depths of Amy Winehouse‘ ‘problem period’ a few weeks ago she was thought to have slumped to just 6 and a half stone in weight”
Exactly how many of the individuals commenting here did more than read the title of the article and look at the pictures before blessing us with your analysis and scripted response.
The ignorance on display here is amazing.
Elly-Ann
May 6, 2008 at 8:52 pm
Ahem* Dave,
here you are correcting grammer and defending yourself when in actuality, the way this article is written:it appears that the fatter Amy is more recent. Who’s the f***ing idiot again?
DaveP
May 6, 2008 at 9:18 pm
You?
jasmin
May 7, 2008 at 10:35 am
hi
Angel
May 7, 2008 at 3:35 pm
“Winehouse has apparently eaten McDonalds for the last 7 days and gained an incredible stone in weight already” u tried to make us think the chubby pic of her was her after putting on weight, like, before and after photos. This is my first time visiting this site and givin the first story I read on here was filled with lies I probably won’t be returning. ur stories aren’t credible, stop writing lies!!
Keith
May 9, 2008 at 2:07 pm
Yea, and her tattoos magically DISAPPEAR in the second photo.
Who are you trying to fool? Ever heard of photoshop? at least add some tats if you are going to try and fool us.
redsongia
May 12, 2008 at 2:12 pm
The second photo is old, from around the time she released her first album. You are the worst reporter who ever lived.
Dan
May 13, 2008 at 8:31 pm
Again, the writer is covering the fact that it’s been RUMORED that Amy has been eating heavy foods for a week or so…
and “making an effort to gain weight”.
NOT that the photo on the right is most recent!!
These comments are proof of the fact that young people have little or non-existent deductive reasoning skills.
Weird. Are the people commenting here British or American? If the latter I can plainly see now how Bush got elected for a second term.
The earlier photo (on the right) is only shown to exaggerate how horribly gaunt Amy had become in the months prior,
by showing what she used to look like!!
Yes- most Western people read from left to right, and therefore assign a chronological value to the photos though none was stated or even implied.
…are you getting this?
Have an opinion? Leave a comment: